However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. On June 16, 2008, the Defendant was sentenced to a summary order of KRW 1,50,000 to a fine for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act at the Changwon District Court on the grounds of a violation of the Road Traffic Act. On September 2, 2011, the Defendant was sentenced to one year of imprisonment and two years of a suspended sentence for the same crime at the same court.

On March 3, 2016, the Defendant driven the J Poter Cargo in the state of alcohol alcohol concentration of about 0.102% without obtaining a driver’s license from the front day of the drinking house in which it is impossible to identify the name in Kimhae-si H at around 01:40 to the front day of the I Poter located in the same Dong.

2. On March 3, 2016, the Defendant: (a) drafted a private signature; and (b) signed the said investigation, on March 3, 2016, at around 01:53, the Defendant was under control by drinking and driving without a license, and was requested to verify a statement of the circumstances of the driver’s driver who was placed in the police station of the Kimhae-gu Police Station before the I cafeteria located in the

The defendant stated in the statement report on the situation of the driver's driver in his job the name of the same student M, and then submitted it to L.

Accordingly, the defendant forged his signature and exercised M's signature for the purpose of exercising it.

3. The Defendant was requested to verify the result of the crackdown on drinking driving through a pDA short machine, as it was controlled by drinking and driving without a license from L at the time and place specified in paragraph 2, such as electronic records, and electronic records, etc.

The Defendant, as an electronic record of a public office, signed “M” and submitted it to L, on the back to the name of M indicated on the end page of the PDA on the basis of the results of the control of drinking driving, which is an electronic record of the public office.

Accordingly, the defendant forged electronic records of public offices and exercised them for the purpose of hindering administrative affairs.

4. The Defendant in violation of the Resident Registration Act shall grant L, which requires a presentation of personal information for the control of driving under drinking at the time and place specified in paragraph (2), to the L, whose resident registration number has been completed.