도로법위반
The defendant shall be innocent.
The summary of the facts charged in the instant case is that the Defendant’s employee B, driving the Defendant’s employee C vehicle on May 31, 1994, in which the Defendant violated the restriction on operation by operating the vehicle in excess of the limit reduction for the vehicle prior to the inspection station in front of the inspection station for the traffic congestion located in the Gangseo-gu, Gangwon-do, Gangwon-do, Gowon-gun on May 31, 1994.
Since punishment laws applied to summary orders subject to review have retroactively lost effect according to the Constitutional Court's decision of unconstitutionality, the defendant is acquitted under the former part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act.