대여금
1. The plaintiff's claims against the defendants are all dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
1. The plaintiff asserted that the plaintiff lent money to the defendants introduced from K. However, since the defendants did not repay only part of the loan and have yet to repay each amount stated in the purport of the claim, the plaintiff sought each remaining loan and its delay damages against the defendants, such as the purport of the claim.
2. The following circumstances are as follows: (a) whether the Plaintiff lent money to the Defendants; (b) Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 9, Eul evidence No. 1 (including the serial number; hereinafter the same shall apply); and (c) witness evidence Nos. 1 through 9, which can be known by adding the whole purport of the pleadings to the testimony of K; (d) the name of the Defendants is indicated as if the Defendants were the borrower; and (e) some of the loan certificates are printed with the seal; (c) the name of the Defendants was written by the horses of K as described above; and (e) the above seal No. 1 to the Defendant’s name was written by K (refer to the evidence No. 1-3); and (b) also the Plaintiff was present as witness at this court and did not recognize that the Defendants participated in the preparation of the above loan certificates; and (c) there was no evidence to acknowledge that the Plaintiff transferred money to the Defendants to the Plaintiff as if the Plaintiff did not appear to have any other evidence to acknowledge that the Defendants borrowed money.
Therefore, the plaintiff's above assertion is without merit.
3. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim against the defendants is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.