도로교통법위반
The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.
1. On April 7, 2016, the Defendant, at around 18:53, driven a three-lane of the road in front of Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government C, having driven a 3-lane of the road in front of the Gangnam-gu Seoul, and proceeded from the shooting distance of the Hanyang apartment to the high-water string of the Hanyang apartment, the width of the road at the point where the 36-lane of the Hanyang apartment is narrow and followed by changing the course.
E Driving violated the way to change course by impeding the passage of Fone Star.
2. The judgment of the court below is that Article 19 (3) of the Road Traffic Act provides that where a driver changes the route from his/her own lane to another lane, if there is a possibility that the driver might obstruct the passage of the latter vehicle running along the lane, the driver shall take precedence in the prior vehicle traffic in order to change the lane by prohibiting the change. In this case, "the case of changing the course of the vehicle" is limited to the case of changing the lane. Thus, it is reasonable to view that the defendant who has run the same lane is likely to obstruct the passage of the Costkex, which he/she runs behind the road narrow.
(1) has violated the method of change in the course;
In addition, even if the evidence submitted by the prosecution is examined, the defendant brought about an obstacle to the passage of the latter vehicle while changing the lane.
subsection (b) of this section.
3. In conclusion, the facts charged in this case constitute a case where there is no proof of crime, and thus, a judgment of not guilty is rendered after the latter part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act, and the summary of the judgment against the defendant under Article 58(2) of the Criminal Act is determined as per Disposition.