If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

1. On June 24, 2013, the Defendant: (a) around 04:20 on June 24, 2013, the victim C, located in Seo-gu Daejeon, Seo-gu, Daejeon, had no intent or ability to pay the price; (b) but would normally pay the price; and (c) had no intent or ability to pay the price, and (d) had no intent or ability to pay the price to pay the price to the victim; and (d) had acquired property

2. On June 15, 2013, at around 21:00, the Defendant: (a) had no intent or ability to pay the price in G management of the Victim F, which is located in Daejeon Dong-gu, Daejeon; (b) had the victim detained, and had the victim paid the price in normal terms; and (c) did not pay 29,000 won to the victim and did not pay the price.

3. On June 16, 2013, around 02:30 on June 16, 2013, the Defendant: (a) had no intent or ability to pay the price; (b) had been in the operation of the International Council of the victim I in Seo-gu Daejeon, Seo-gu, Daejeon; (c) had the victim been placed in the place of the order with the victim, and did not pay 38,000 won to the victim; and (d) had the victim received pecuniary

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. C’s written statement and F’s written statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on account statements and customer placed documents;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the choice of punishment;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for not less than Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.