However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The Defendant, under the direction of the phishingman, withdrawn the money deposited into the phishing criminal act, and delivered it to the phishing staff, with the intention of facilitating the criminal act.

On April 17, 2018, the official who is responsible for the administration of the C Bank's assets and the staff of the C Bank.

It is possible to lend low interest rates with government funds.

First, in order to verify credit rating, I will directly repay to the bank account designated by the credit card loan loan loan loan.

“A false statement” was made.

However, the above officer did not have the intention or ability to provide loans to the victim.

At around 09:50 on the same day from the person who deceivings the victim as above and was delivered to the E bank account (F) in the name of the defendant's spouse D at around 00,000 won.

On April 17, 2018, the Defendant received an instruction from the Defendant to withdraw money deposited in the said account from the Defendant’s name-free singing staff, and then withdrawn KRW 10 million from the E Bank Dong branch located in Dobong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government E Bank G on April 17, 2018, and sent it to another Bosing staff.

As a result, the defendant aided and abetted the crime of fraud by facilitating that a member of the phishing organization obtains money from the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against B;

1. Details of transactions in D accounts;

1. Application of details of each transaction, written request for deposits, statutes;

1. Relevant legal provisions of the Criminal Act, Articles 347(1) and 32(1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. This case’s content that was taken part in the criminal sentencing of Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act is not weak, but it is against the defendant’s recognition of the criminal act, and there is no benefit from the defendant. The motive for the criminal act, the defendant’s age, sexual behavior, etc.