A. On September 15, 2009, Plaintiff A was consulted about the extension of breast at a Fa Hospital run by the Defendant and was subject to counseling on the extension of breast age.

B. On October 15, 2009, the Plaintiff received an explosive extension surgery (hereinafter “the instant surgery”) by inserting a type of universal figure from the Defendant.

The information of the tangible material inserted in the medical record prepared at the time is indicated as ‘240C, Han-do, and Kohnegel'.

C. After undergoing the instant surgery, the Plaintiff asked the Defendant of the symptoms of the construction of a strings, following both sides of the instant surgery, and the Defendant asked the Defendant about this. The Defendant said that the construction of a strings would be alleviated upon the lapse of six months after the mitigation of the construction of a strings.

However, even after one year from the date of the instant surgery, the symptoms for the construction of the Gu were not mitigated.

C. Upon the continued symptoms of the building of both relics, Plaintiff A entered the Defendant Hospital on June 22, 201, and discharged the Plaintiff from the hospital on or around June 24, 2011, after receiving a brupt removal surgery (hereinafter “the brupt removal surgery on June 22, 2011”), the Plaintiff stated that the Plaintiff had received a certain operation with respect to the brupt removal and antibiotics treatment (the crupt removal and spathing treatment), according to the written confirmation of the operation, the entry discharge records include that the Plaintiff received a brupt removal and antibiotics treatment (the crupt removal and spathing treatment), and that the brupt removal is written as the brupt removal surgery (the crush removal). D.

Plaintiff

A, even after the bomb removal on June 22, 2011, the symptoms of old construction continue to exist, A refers to the bomb removal on March 14, 2012, hereinafter referred to as "the bomb removal method on March 14, 2012, referring to the bomb removal method as of March 14, 2012."

was received.

E. On April 9, 2012, Plaintiff A complained of a severe pain on the heat and chest’s chest, and applied to the Hanyang University Hospital. The Hanyang University Hospital diagnosed Plaintiff A to the diagnosis that it is a universal water distribution, infection and infection of both banks, and a change in the establishment of a basin. The universal material on April 10, 2012.