beta
(영문) 부산지방법원 2015.01.30 2014고합833

변호사법위반등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for three years.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for five years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

around September 2012, the Defendant, who was introduced victim E from D around September 2012, talked as if he had worked in the legal profession, and was aware of it.

On June 4, 2013, the Defendant heard that F, an son of the victim, was subject to an investigation by the police due to the crime of occupational deterioration, and, on the purport that “I wish to receive money and valuables from the victim in the form of entertainment expenses, etc., on the following grounds: (a) I wish to receive money and valuables from the victim: (b) “I have to know, who is, and is not within, the inner me, how you are, how you are, and how you will know, how you can see; and (c) I have to know, how you can see.”

At around 16:00 on June 10, 2013, the Defendant stated that "it is necessary to provide three members of the prosecutor's office with meals and alcohols to three members of the prosecutor's office, but it is necessary to provide three million won on the road near Busan Doksan-dong, Busan Doksan-dong."

However, the defendant did not know the staff of the prosecutor's office, and was thought to be used for living expenses or cosmetics multi-level projects even after receiving money, so there was no intention or ability to favorable in criminal cases by visiting the staff of the prosecutor's office or soliciting the staff of the prosecutor'

Accordingly, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as above, received KRW 3 million from the victim as entertainment expenses for employees of the prosecutor's office on the same day, and received money and valuables under the pretext of soliciting the affairs handled by the public officials at the same time by receiving KRW 58,88 million in total 14 times as shown in the attached list of crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The E-examination part of each police interrogation protocol against the defendant

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. Part of the police statement concerning D;

1. A statement of transactions of free savings deposits (G name), certificate of confirmation, statement of transactions of free savings deposits (H name), statement of transactions of free savings deposits (H name), cashier's checks issued by each customer, statement of inquiries into consolidated prosecution cases, written judgments, and written judgments;