If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

From January 1, 2013 to December 4, 2013, the Defendant had access to the Internet gambling site (D) at the residential area located in the Simju City from January 1, 2013 to December 4, 2013, and then had access to 24 accounts, such as the Defendant’s name corporate bank E and Cth Bank F account from gambling site operators G, etc., and 329 charges as shown in the attached list of crimes in the attached list of crimes, as shown in the attached list of crimes, are recorded 312 times in total, and the list of crimes to be attached to the indictment is recorded only in the list of crimes that are recorded only in the list of crimes to be attached to the indictment. Accordingly, the Defendant recognizes the criminal facts by immediately counting them based on evidence, such as 86-93 pages and 96 pages of the investigation records.

Over the past, 563,774,50 won was deposited by the operator, and the bank and flaser received 52 copies of the card from the operator and received 52 copies of the card, and flass and flass flass cambling one of the bank and flass, and the sum of which is 9, the sum of which was 9, was flass in such a way as to determine the winning by means of a flascam for which a person who is close to 9, receives dividends according to the fluening rate.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Data concerning the closure of the gambling site;

1. A detailed statement of passbook transaction submitted by the suspect;

1. Report on the results of investigation and the application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the investigation report (revision of deposits on gambling sites);

1. Article 246 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting the crime;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. In light of the reasons for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, the fine stipulated in the summary order shall be reduced by taking into account the following circumstances: (a) it appears that a serious punishment is necessary in light of the period of gambling, frequency, scale of gambling, etc.; (b) however, the primary offender is a principal offender; and (c) efforts are made to treat gambling addiction.