도로교통법위반(음주운전)
The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.
1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (unlawful in sentencing) of the Defendant’s sentence (two years of suspended sentence in October) imposed by the lower court (two years of suspended sentence, observation of protection, community service order 160 hours, and 40 hours of lecture attendance order for compliance driving) is too uneased and unreasonable.
2. In light of the circumstances asserted by the prosecutor on the grounds of appeal, the lower court’s punishment is too uneasible and unreasonable, even in light of the circumstances asserted by the prosecutor on the grounds of appeal.
3. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is dismissed under Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit, and it is so decided as per Disposition (Article 25 of the Regulation on Criminal Procedure). However, the "2. 23. 23. 2, 2006" of the judgment of the court below pursuant to Article 25 of the Regulation on Criminal Procedure is " August 23, 2006" and the "3. 4. 3. 4."