beta
(영문) 인천지방법원 2013.04.10 2013고단633

특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주차량)등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a Belgium car.

1. Violation of the Road Traffic Act;

A. On October 1, 2012, at around 23:10, the Defendant driven the said car without obtaining a driver’s license from approximately 10km section from the front road of 372, Seo-gu, Incheon, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Incheon to the front road of Taesan apartment located in the same city-gu, Gyeyang-gu.

B. On October 2, 2012, the Defendant driven the said car without obtaining a driver’s license from the front side of the Taesan Apartment apartment in Gyeyang-gu Incheon Gyeyang-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, to the front side of the market in the Bupyeong-gu, Bupyeong-gu, Bupyeong-gu, Incheon Metropolitan City.

C. On October 2, 2012, around 05:00, the Defendant driven the said car without obtaining a driver’s license from the front side of the market street in Bupyeong-gu Incheon Bupyeong-gu, Incheon, to the front side of the bus stop of the 227 Mcocoa apartment bus stops in the same Gu Samsan-dong, Samsan-dong to the front side of the bus stop.

2. On October 2, 2012, around 05:13, the Defendant violated the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes) and the Road Traffic Act (U.S.A.) driving the said vehicle and driving it at a speed that would not be known about the three-lanes between the 3-lane and the 00-lanes from the 3-lane distance from the 3-lane distance from the Busan Bupyeong-gu Busan Metropolitan City Busan Metropolitan Government bus stops.

In this case, the defendant engaged in driving duty has a duty of care to drive the bus by well examining the course of the vehicle in front while reducing speed and maintaining a safe distance with the vehicle in front at night.

Nevertheless, the defendant neglected this and failed to secure a safe distance, and proceeded ahead of the vehicle of the defendant due to the negligence of neglecting the duty of a front-time driver and neglecting the duty of a front-time driver.