All appeals filed by A and prosecutor are dismissed.

A. Defendant A1) As evidence consistent with the facts charged against Defendant A, the victim B, E’s investigative agency, and the court of original instance have made each statement of the victims, but each statement of the victims has been gradually embodied from the investigative agency to the court of original instance in the direction of avoiding their responsibility depending on the passage of time from the investigation agency to the court of original instance. Each statement of the victims that Defendant A used multiple and fake victims in the corridor of the prosecutor’s office attached to each prosecutor’s office where the prosecutor and investigator used in the investigation agency are in charge cannot be easily accepted, and its credibility is difficult, the victims filed a retaliation complaint after the victim filed a complaint against the victims, and the victims could not be ruled out the possibility of false statements due to the hostile appraisal of the defendant A. However, when the defendant A puts the victim B’s losses at the time, it constitutes an act of unfair sentencing to the extent that it does not interfere with the victim’s losses and thus, it constitutes an act of unfair sentencing to the extent that the victim’s losses were inappropriate under the social norms and thus, it constitutes an act of unfair sentencing against the victim A and E.

B. In comparison with the fact that the mother of the Defendant B, who is the victim, made the victim’s insulting speech with each other, the victim A and the Defendant B unilaterally use each of the assault committed against the victim E and the Defendant B.