However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On February 8, 2017, the Defendant: (a) around 00:10 on February 8, 2017, at the main point operated by the Victim C in Bupyeong-si, Seocheon-si, B, the Defendant dumpeded his fingers by breading beer disease on the floor of the area under the influence of alcohol and destroying it, humping his hand, huming him, huming him, huming him, huming his sound, and huming him.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the victim's main business by force.

On January 27, 2017, the Defendant was unable to avoid disturbance for a period of about one hour, such as 0:50 on January 27, 2017, when drinking alcohol in the trade name of “F” operated by the victim E on D2 in Bupyeong-si, Seocheon-si, 2017, by thinking that next customers are able to report on themselves and undergo an examination. B, “I am for the weather,” “I am for the weather, I am for the weather, I am for the weather, I am for the beer, and am for the beer and the beer with sound, and the he am for the beer and the beer.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the victim's main business by force.

Summary of Evidence

[2017 Highest 513]

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. C’s statement;

1. A report on investigation;

1. Photographs (2017 Highest 783);

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to field photographs and suspect self-injury photographs;

1. Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act and the choice of punishment for the crime, Articles 314 of the Criminal Act and the choice of imprisonment;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. Reasons for the sentencing of Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act, including observation of protection and community service work;

1. Scope of the recommended sentences according to the sentencing criteria;

(a) Class 1 crime [the scope of recommended punishment] [the scope of punishment] shall be limited to the mitigated area (one month to eight months] (including a special mitigated person] penalty not for the recovery of damage (including a serious effort to recover damage);

(b) Type 1 (Interference with Business) in the mitigation area (one month to eight months) (including special mitigation persons) in the mitigation area (including a serious effort to recover damage) in the scope of the second crime (the scope of recommended punishment).

2. The scope of final sentence due to the aggravation of multiple offenses: