2...

A, around 12:30 on September 23, 2004, around 12:30, from June 13, 2005 to Seoul National University Hospital (hereinafter “Plaintiff Hospital”) started to receive outpatient treatment.

Plaintiff

From June 13, 2005 to May 17, 2011, hospitals diagnosed A as Type 1 (CRPS I) of A, after performing pharmacologic treatment and dental treatment over several times, such as paculous and chronological blocking, fluoral antipaculation, fluoral antipacopic pacopic pacopic pacopic, and chronological pacopic pacopic pacopic pacopic pacopic pacopic pacopic pacopics, and copic pacopic pacopic pacopic pacopic pacopics and final copics on the left-hand side on May 27, 2011 and on June 3, 2011.

Plaintiff

After the above procedure, the hospital had the pain on the left-hand side, but still continued to prove the pain on the left-hand side, and on July 19, 201, and July 27, 201, the hospital conducted the scale receiver, receiver, pilot, and final insertion on the left-hand side (hereinafter “instant procedure”).

In 2011, the defendant issued a certificate of payment guarantee to the plaintiff that the plaintiff should pay A medical expenses according to the standard for automobile insurance medical fees (However, medical expenses with no proximate causal relation with traffic accidents are not guaranteed).

On September 5, 2011, the Plaintiff filed a claim against the Defendant for medical expenses of KRW 14,551,020 relating to the instant medical treatment. On September 21, 201, the Defendant paid KRW 11,786,320 out of the above medical expenses to the Plaintiff, and filed a petition for review with the Motor Vehicle Insurance Medical Fee Dispute Resolution Council (hereinafter “Council”) asserting that the instant medical treatment was excessive.

On March 15, 2012, the Council may confirm the compensation status that can be grasped as a result of psychological tests, such as DIT and MPI, which was diagnosed in the first type by the Plaintiff Hospital in the Complex M&C No. 1.