On September 26, 2013, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of one year and six months by imprisonment with prison labor at the Jeonju District Court for a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, which became final and conclusive on October 5, 2013, and is currently under the suspended sentence.

On December 2, 2014, at around 02:50, the Defendant intruded into the above main points under Vinyl chloride vinyl C at the main points located in Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu, U.S., the Defendant attempted to steal or steal the victims’ property worth KRW 370,000,000 in total on six occasions from around the time of the following period: (a) 10,000 in cash owned by the victim D, and USD 11,00 in the ship of the Kabter; and (b) 111,00 in the ship of the Kabter; and (c) 370,000,000 in total from the end of December 2, 2014, the Defendant attempted to steal or steal the victims’ property, such as the list of crimes in the attached list.

Accordingly, the defendant habitually stolen or attempted to steals the victims' property.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each statement of D, E, and F;

1. Each report on occurrence, each on-site inspection report, investigation report, investigation report (in the form before or after the crime of a suspect), CCTV suspect's photograph), investigation report (in the first day of December), investigation report (in the first day of December), inquiry report, inquiry report on request for appraisal, and official photo of each field;

1. Previous records of judgment: Application of criminal records, inquiry records, and copy of judgment;

1. Relevant Articles 32, 330, and 342 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. From among concurrent crimes, sentence is inevitable on the ground that the defendant, for the reasons of sentencing under the former part of Article 37, Article 38(1)2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act, committed the instant crime without being aware of the fact that he/she committed the instant crime without being aware of it during the period of suspension of execution of the same crime, and the quality of the crime is not good

However, the defendant's mistake is against the defendant's depth, the total amount of damage to the crime of this case is not significant as 3.70,000 won, and the defendant's distance is cut and economically poor.