[2] A person who was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes at the Seoul District Court on October 8, 2002; on February 2, 2007, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes at the Seoul Central District Court on February 2, 2007; on December 12, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes; on June 9, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes; on June 9, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes; and on August 19, 2017, he/she was sentenced to ten times of larceny.

[2] On September 30, 2018, around 20:49, the Defendant habitually intruded into the above Health Center with a opening door after checking the victim’s location at the D Health Center operated by the victim C on the B1st floor at the time of light lighting, and then thefted with a bank room equivalent to 70,000 won of cash owned by the victim on the front half of the place, and 30,000 won of the market price at night at night equivalent to 30,000 won of the market price, such as 1, E welfare card, 1, E cash card, 1, F card, 1, G card, and resident registration.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A written statement prepared in C;

1. Investigation report (Correction of the amount of damaged articles);

1. Records of crimes: Investigation reports (recognating repeated crimes and binding of the same military records), and respective written judgments and circulars to inquiries attached thereto;

1. Habituality of judgment: Application of the statutes to the extent that the commission of theft is recognized in light of the records of each crime in the judgment and the fact that the crimes of several methods identical to those of the past punished are repeated;

1. Articles 332 and 330 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting the crime;

1. The reason for sentencing Article 35 of the Criminal Act for aggravated repeated crimes is that the defendant was punished as the same kind of crime in the past, and even during the repeated crime period, he did not throw away the habit of larceny and again committed the crime in this case, and the nature of the crime is not good.

On the other hand, this case.