beta
(영문) 대구지방법원 포항지원 2013.04.22 2012고합201

특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(보복협박등)등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Around November 201, 2012, the Defendant: (a) around 20:30 on the part of November 201, 2012, the Defendant: (b) d’D operated by the Victim C in North Korea-si B, North Korea-si; and (c) d’D’ operated by the Victim C; and (d) d’, frighted

Therefore, as the victim was withdrawn from the defendant, he saw it as a tabbb, followed the table tabb, which is laid a tab, followed by the tabbbb, and again tabing the table tab, which has another customer, “I will do so, franch management. I will do so. I will do so. I will do so,” put in the television tabb, and re- remove the gas tabs on the side, and put three maribs and two mawns together, and broken the macy and gas tabs.

As a result, the defendant damaged one television-contribute, one gas-contribute, three junopum, and two junopum.

2. On November 11, 2012, the Defendant: (a) was arrested as a flagrant offender and was investigated on the part of the police boxes of the Pohangbuk-gu, North Korea Coast Guard located in North Korea-gu, North Korea at the port and port of port on November 21, 2012; (b) on the part of the above C’s report, the Defendant

The Defendant attempted to smoke tobacco at a certain place, and the security guards assigned to the F police box that prevented him from smoking at a non-smoking place.

At the same time, the above G was able to take a bath for the said G by a large sound, and the circumstances where the Ffers affiliated with the Ffers laid down the chest on the left left side of the said G by the hand hand of the Defendant who was fashing.

Accordingly, the defendant assaulted the above police officer to interfere with the legitimate execution of duties of the police officer in relation to arrest and investigation of flagrant offenders.

3. Violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Duplicative Intimidation, etc.) aims to raise awareness that the Defendant was subject to investigation by the F police box due to property damage and damage, as described in paragraph 2, by reporting by the victim C (V, 50 years of age) and retaliation against the victim.