The defendant is innocent. The summary of this judgment shall be notified publicly.

Nevertheless, G arbitrarily prepared a subcontract modification contract and a notification of subcontract subcontract (revision) by changing the deadline for construction work of E and Managics into March 26, 2017, and forged a private document by affixing B employee seal to each contract.

Therefore, the defendant filed a complaint against G and E, such as fabrication of private documents, etc., so the defendant did not have any intention to commit a crime against the defendant at the time of submitting the written complaint.

2. The summary of the facts charged is that the Defendant was the actual operator of B, and B was awarded a contract for the “D general industrial complex expansion work” ordered by the C market, and on November 5, 2015, the part of the steel structure construction among the above construction works was subcontracted to E (representative F) and agreed on November 4, 2016. G was a “D general industrial complex expansion work” as a staff member of B from March 1, 2016 to November 14, 2016.

On January 2017, the Defendant had an attorney-at-law I prepare a written complaint at a law firm located in H in Jung-gu Seoul, Jung-gu, Seoul.

A written complaint is that “G and F shall prepare and forge a standard subcontract agreement and subcontract agreement (revision) in the name of the J representative director, which shall be changed from November 4, 2016 to March 26, 2017 between B and E without the Defendant’s permission for the purpose of exercising the contract at an influent place on October 28, 2016, and submitted to the public official in charge of C viewing this time, and thus, shall be punished as forgery of private documents and uttering of a falsified investigation document.”