A. Comprehensively taking into account the overall purport of arguments as to Gap's delegation contract between the plaintiff and the defendant, Gap evidence Nos. 3 through 7, 10, 11, 12, 21, Gap evidence Nos. 9 and 22, Eul evidence Nos. 1, 22, and Eul witness Eul's testimony, the defendant, as a company engaged in the production, sale, export, or painting of mixing materials between franchis and operated the defendant's products in Kazaktan, and suspended the plaintiff's business to give orders for the sale and painting of the products produced by the defendant in Kazaktan, and the defendant, upon introduction of D, visited the plaintiff's 2, who operated the farm in Kazaktan, to resume the business suspended in Kazaktan's 6,000,000 won of the plaintiff's products, 10,000 won of the plaintiff's products, 2,000,000 won of the plaintiff's products supplied to the plaintiff.