손실보상금
1. The Defendant’s each of the Plaintiffs’ KRW 15,609,380, as well as 5% per annum from April 20, 2016 to April 26, 2017.
1. Details of ruling;
A. Approval and Public Notice of Project - Road Project Name: C (hereinafter “instant project”): Public Notice given by the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport on June 3, 2014 - Project Operator: Defendant
B. On February 26, 2016, the Central Land Tribunal rendered a ruling of expropriation (hereinafter “the instant ruling of expropriation”) on February 26, 2016, 1/2 shares out of 1/2 shares of the land-based E-Gu, Daegu Northern-gu, Daegu-gu, Seoul-gu, Seoul-gu, and 675 square meters in size as above, and 1/2 shares of the land-based E-gu, Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, and 675 square meters,
hereinafter referred to as “instant land” with the area of 675 square meters in Daegu Northern-gu E, Daegu-gu, and the area adjacent to the ground shall be referred to as “instant obstacles.”
- From the starting date of expropriation: Compensation for losses on April 19, 2016 - (hereinafter referred to as "compensation for expropriation" in the table of subsection (d) below) (hereinafter referred to as "compensation for expropriation"): 422,465,620 won: < Amended by Act No. 422,465,620 won; Act No. 168,901,000 won - An appraisal corporation: An appraisal corporation at sight and a fixed appraisal corporation (hereinafter referred to as "appraisal for expropriation"):
C. The Central Land Tribunal rendered an objection on September 29, 2016 (hereinafter “instant objection”): The content of the adjudication: (a) deeming the obstacles in the instant case to have been omitted from five actual trees; and (b) determine compensation as KRW 127,500; and (c) dismissing an objection seeking an increase in compensation for the land in the instant case and the remainder of the obstacles. - An appraisal corporation and the central appraisal corporation (hereinafter “instant appraisal”)
D. As a result of the court’s appraisal, the appraiser F assessed the adequate compensation for the instant land as indicated below in the “court appraisal compensation” column.
(hereinafter referred to as “court appraisal,” the Plaintiff filed an application for appraisal of the obstacles of this case, and subsequently withdrawn the application for appraisal on the ground that it was not present.) (Amount unit: the Plaintiff withdrawn the application.) The court’s appraisal of the compensation for the adjudication of expropriation subject to the order of expropriation by the court.