When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

1. On August 13, 2014, the Defendant: (a) around 22:50 on August 13, 2014, the Defendant: (b) destroyed the Defendant’s repair cost of KRW 2,205,531 on the top of the victim C-owned D-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W

2. At around 23:00 on the same day as Paragraph 1, the Defendant: (a) committed assault at one time on the left part of G with a hand-on hand, on the ground that the circumstances leading up to the F District Office located in Sung-gun E around 23:0, the Defendant, who was arrested as a flagrant offender for the same reason as Paragraph 1, would cause the Defendant to sit.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate investigation of police officers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement concerning C and G;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on investigation (Attachment to photographs of the damaged vehicle and estimates);

1. Articles 366 and 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the relevant criminal facts, and the choice of fines for negligence;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for not less than Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.