However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On September 21, 2019, the Defendant, at around 02:10, c “C” located in Seongdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government on September 21, 2019, brought the victim’s head one time, citing 15cm ( approximately 15cm in length, about 10cm in height, and about 5cm in thickness) a dangerous object that had been put to the said restaurant hold in the said restaurant in the hands of the victim D (Nam and 50 years of age).

As a result, the Defendant assaulted the victim with dangerous objects, and caused the victim to have a tear of the treatment days.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. Photographss, photographs of the instrument of crime, damaged parts of the crime, and the closure of the crime situation, photographs, and records of the crime;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to report on investigation (investigation into the size of stones used by a suspect, and confirmation of the fact of injury to a victim);

1. Articles 258-2 (1) and 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. 집행유예 형법 제62조 제1항 양형의 이유 불리한 정상: 피고인이 돌로 피해자의 머리를 내리친 행위는 위험성이 매우 큰 점, 피해자는 머리를 3바늘 꿰매는 치료를 받았는바 상해의 결과가 가볍다고 볼 수 없는 점 유리한 정상: 피고인이 자신의 잘못을 뉘우치며 반성하는 점, 피해자와 합의한 점, 동종 범행으로 처벌받은 전력은 없는 점 그밖에 피고인의 나이, 성행, 범행의 동기, 수단과 결과, 범행 후의 정황 등 변론에 나타난 양형조건을 참작