beta
(영문) 울산지방법원 2017.02.16 2016나20619

소유권이전등기

Text

1. The judgment of the court of first instance is modified as follows.

The plaintiff's defendant and the defendant's intervenor's joint investment development.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The reasons stated in this part by the court are the second side of the judgment of the first instance except for the addition of the following contents:

1. Since part of the entry is the same, it shall be quoted in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

B. The following is added under Chapter 4, Chapter 8, of the first instance judgment.

H. On April 16, 2015, when the instant lawsuit is pending, the ownership transfer registration on April 16, 2015 on the ground of trust to the International Asset Trust Co., Ltd. of the Defendant, was completed on May 4, 2016 on the ground that the ownership transfer registration on May 4, 2016 was based on the trust to the Defendant, and on the ground that the ownership transfer registration on May 4, 2016 was based on the trust to the Defendant, Korea Asset Trust Co., Ltd. of the Defendant, the ownership transfer registration on July 29, 2016 on the ground that the ownership transfer registration on July 29, 2016 was made on the ground that the ownership transfer registration on July 29, 2016 to the Defendant Intervenor Yangsan Investment Trust Co., Ltd. of the Defendant Intervenor, and on the ground that the ownership transfer registration was completed on July 29, 2016 on the ground that the trust to the Defendant

C. In addition to the fourth part of the judgment of the first instance [based grounds for recognition], the phrase “A No. 30” is added.

2. The parties' assertion

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion 1) The land titleholder, the registration of ownership preservation of which was completed on the instant land, shall be limited to L, the B’s ID (Death on July 1, 1964, and hereinafter “the decedent”).

A) The same person and his heir (the death of June 6, 1993) succeeded to the above land at the ratio of 6/10, N, G, P, Q, each of 1/10, and B succeeded to 1/10 of the above land shares as the heir of M. B. Meanwhile, since the above ownership transfer registration of N was invalid without any cause, the above ownership transfer registration of N was completed without the ownership transfer registration of the plaintiff, YYDD Co., Ltd., Ltd., YY, Switzerland Construction Co., Ltd., Switzerland Corporation, Guichidi Co., Ltd., chidi Co., Ltd., Defendant, and Defendant transferee, both.