When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On April 10, 2015, the Defendant driven the C Otoba, which was not a mandatory insurance policy, and proceeded from the second apartment of the apartment site, to E at a speed of about 10km per hour from the 2nd apartment site where the Defendant demanded the D front road of the Suwon-si, Suwon-si.

Despite the fact that the Defendant was a stop signal from the distance on which the signal lights were installed, the Defendant damaged the damaged vehicle in a way that the front part of the Defendant’s vehicle in front of the driving of the victim F (F, South, 39 years old) that was directly driven by the signal signals from every direction of the water source to the left-hand distance from each side of the transmitting side by occupational negligence, which attempted to turn to the left-hand turn, in violation of the signal from each direction on the side of the second apartment complex of the claim, and caused the collision with the left part of the Defendant’s driving.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. Mandatory insurance inquiries (referring to 8%). Written estimates, and signal cycle signs;

1. A photograph of the scene of the accident, a photograph of the accident vehicle, and the ECCTV caps;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes governing CCTV storage;

1. Relevant Article of the Act concerning the facts constituting an offense, Article 151 of the Road Traffic Act, Articles 46 (2) 2 and 8 of the Guarantee of Automobile Compensation Act, which provide for the operation of automobiles which are not mandatory insurance;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;