2. The judgment is recognized that the defendant committed a crime in which he/she committed a crime in his/her depth and repents his/her depth, seems to have reached a contingent crime, and that he/she has dependents and is not under economic conditions.

However, in full view of the following circumstances: (a) the instant crime was committed against a police officer who is performing legitimate duties at a large amount of ten minutes; (b) the nature of the instant crime is not weak; (c) the Defendant has the criminal records of having been sentenced to four times a fine for obstruction of performance of official duties or violent crimes; (d) the Defendant did not present any circumstance to change the sentence of the lower court in the trial; and (e) other circumstances that are conditions for sentencing, such as the Defendant’s age, career, environment, etc., the sentence imposed by the lower court is too unreasonable.

3. As such, the defendant's appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.