The defendant shall be ordered to complete the sexual assault treatment program for 40 hours.

On 2015, the Defendant was the chairperson of “C” of “B,” a meeting of the Internet club, and became aware of the mobile phone numbers of the victim D (W, 39 years old) who caused the Defendant to be present.

1. On May 9, 2017, the Defendant would want to see the victim’s phone by drinking the phone while drinking alcohol at the F community service center’s public parking lot located in the Southern City, Ma in the south of 22:12,50,000.

핥고 싶다.

I want to do so.

I would like to put fingers into them.

“.......”

2. On May 10, 2017, the Defendant 00:38, at the same time and at the same time, calls from the victim for a telephone at the above location, thereby promptly seeing that the victim is a weather.

Shall see the same year as the bit of bitbit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a crime.

“.....”

Accordingly, the defendant reached the victim with a view to meeting his sexual desire, which causes sexual humiliation and aversion to the victim through telephone twice.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of the witness D;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to telephone recording files;

1. Article 13 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes and the Selection of Imprisonment with prison labor, in relation to the crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. The main sentence of Article 16 (2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes Committed to Order;

1. Article 47(1) and Article 49(1) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Registered Information Disclosure or Information Disclosure Order; Article 49(1)2 and Article 50(1)2 of the Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse; and Article 56(1)2 of the Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse, on the grounds of sentencing, the Defendant is subject to the instant victim’s crime; and the Defendant appears to have contacted the victim several times even before reaching the instant crime; and the details of the statement are very low enough to cause sexual humiliation.