If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

1. The fraud, Defendant B, and Defendant B, against those who want to purchase an article on the Internet site, expressed that they would send an article in the event of remitting money in the absence of a sale object, and received money from the trusted ones to use it for the cost of living.

On August 25, 2010, the Defendant and B made a false statement to the victim C, who posted a letter of intent to purchase the ampling frith on the Internet “ direct trade (http:/www.g.com)” website column, stating that “170,000 won is sent to the victim C by call on the face of remittance.”

Defendant and B, as such, conspired to deception the victim and then received KRW 170,000 from the foreign exchange bank account (Account Number D) in the same day.

B. As the Defendant and B came to know of the fact that they want to purchase two of the two of the victims E in the above “direct trade” website on the same day, the Defendant and B fraudulently stated that “I would send two of the victims with two of the two of the two of the 1,282,000 won, middle of the 1,282,000 won, on the face of remittance.”

Defendant and B, as such, conspired to deception the victim and then received KRW 1,282,00 from the victim’s bank account on the same day.

C. Around September 26, 2010, Defendant B posted a notice on the Internet “China” website stating that the Defendant and B sold a opt and a amper, a massage, to the Internet, and the victim F sent a false statement to the effect that the victim F would send a opt and a opt to the Defendant’s home to the Defendant, upon receiving a prior payment of KRW 235,000 to the Defendant, after checking the deposit.

Defendant and B, as such, conspired to deception the victim and received KRW 235,000 from the corporate bank account (Account Number G) in the name of B on the same day, and in the same way, from August 19, 2010 to October 11 of the same year, the sum of 30 times in total, as shown in the separate list of crimes, is 4.