When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On February 17, 2016, at around 02:00, the Defendant: (a) got a large amount of the drinking value that the Defendant was requested by employees F to calculate from the “D's main point of week” of the operation of C in Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-do; and (b) took a cellular phone from the F's cell phone to take a bath.

1. Whether the Defendant, who is an employee of this other company, would be entitled to do so from the victim G (at the age of 34) who is now employed.

In order to hear the horses “,” I am saw that “I am bling off,” and ambling fire extinguishers, which is a dangerous object under the camera, one time the head of the victim was fluened, fluent the head of the victim’s head, fluent the victim’s head head, and fluent the victim’s head before the toilet, and assault the victim’s brue several times by the following generation.

2. After assaulting the victim as above, the Defendant destroyed 250,000 won to repair the two sides owned by the victim C on two occasions by entering the above main toilets.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made with respect to G, H and F;

1. A written estimate for an investigation report;

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. Relevant Article 261 of the Criminal Act, Articles 260 (1) (a) of the Criminal Act (a point of special assault), Article 366 of the Criminal Act, and the selection of fines for the crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The crime of this case on the grounds of sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act for the order of provisional payment is deemed to have committed an assault by the defendant carrying dangerous articles and damaged the property.

However, the punishment as ordered shall be determined by taking into consideration all the sentencing conditions shown in the arguments of this case, such as the defendant's age, sex, environment, criminal records, criminal records, circumstances after the crime, etc., and the fact that the defendant has committed an error against the victims and agreed smoothly with the victims, the defendant has no record of the same kind of crime, and the defendant has no record