When the defendant does not pay the above fine.

On February 10, 2013, at the defendant's house of Seongdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, 102 Dong 1604, and 112 reported by the defendant, the defendant demanded that the police officer affiliated with the Seoul Sungdong Police Station D police box "I ambling her bath," who was called upon the defendant's 112 report, "I ambling her bath," but the above E cannot move out solely on the ground that I ambling her f's can not move out on the ground that I ambling the above E, I ambling her f's balth, and prevented the police officer's legitimate execution of duties as to the handling of the report of this case."

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of witness E and G;

1. Application of police statements to E, F’s written statements, and F’s written statements;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;

1. The defendant did not have the same criminal records for sentencing under Article 186(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, and the place of the crime is the defendant's residence, and the degree of the police officer's assault is not heavy. However, the act of assaulting the police officer performing official duties in uniform does not in itself mean that the nature of the crime and the criminal facts per se are not easy, and the act of assaulting the police officer performing official duties is consistent with the reasoning that does not fit the reasoning after the crime of this case to this court, and it cannot be deemed that the fine of two million won prescribed in the summary order is more severe, and the above fine is imposed as it is, in full view of the above facts.