except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. On June 201, the Defendant against the Victim (State)C (Representative D) was said to be the Defendant at the G conference room operated by the F in Jongno-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, stating that the said F would pay all principal and interest, including the interest of KRW 30 million, until November 30, 201, if he/she lends KRW 100,000. The said F would offer (State) shares of KRW 71,600 (Share 37.68%) held as security, and that the said F would enter into a contract with a debtor with a financial capacity (State).

However, the Defendant did not have any qualifications or rights to borrow money in the above H’s name, as the Defendant did not have invested in the said H’s capital. At the time, I (State) operated by the Defendant had almost no record of business closure, and had no intent or ability to repay personal debts up to KRW 300 million even if he/she borrowed money from the victim.

Nevertheless, on June 22, 2011, the Defendant, by deceiving F, received KRW 100,000 from the Victim (State)C, a subsidiary company of the said G, a delivery of KRW 100,000 to the one bank account under the name of the State H, under the pretext of borrowing money.

2. Around November 23, 2012, the Defendant against the victim J said that the victim J was the victim J, and “(State) H was the actual internal company and was the representative director. Therefore, the Defendant would create and supply at H a 3,000 crolog cream up to December 2012, 200 won.”

However, the defendant was only the shareholder of H and did not actually operate H, and there was no intention or ability to produce and deliver articles by the delivery deadline.

Nevertheless, around November 23, 2012, the Defendant deceivings the victim as above and received 5 million won from the victim to the account of community credit cooperatives in the name of the Defendant as the cost of manufacturing cosmetics.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes of each police statement to K and J;

1. Criminal facts;