1. On December 9, 2016, around 11:30 on December 9, 2016, the Defendant attempted to larceny by inserting the victim’s share in the display stand in Seongdong-gu Seoul, Seongdong-gu, Seoul, in total, KRW 41,700, total market value of the victim’s share in the display stand, and subsequently exposing the victim’s share in the main machine, thereby committing attempted theft.

2. The defendant interference with the business of the above victim D who discovered the defendant about about 30 minutes at the date, time, place specified in the above paragraph 1, and "ponner is changed to her employee D.

“,” and “b,”

The noise, such as “,” was fluored on the floor, and the noise was committed to other customers in the vicinity, thereby hindering the victim’s marina business by force.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each written statement of D;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to ct v video photographs (offs and obstructive pages of duties);

1. Relevant Articles 342, 329, and 314 (1) of the Criminal Act (a point of interference with business) and the choice of imprisonment with prison labor for a criminal offense;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;