However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On March 19, 2017, the Defendant: (a) parked in front of the D cafeteria located in the D cafeteria located in the Suwon-si Metropolitan Area C on March 23:18, 2017; (b) the EK5 car owned by the Defendant; (c) the Victim F (F (n, nine months) who is a pro-child, had the victims of diving in the kypt; and (d) approximately twenty (20) hours and twenty (20) hours in the neighboring PC room.

Accordingly, the defendant abandons the victimized child under his protection and supervision.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police in relation to G;

1. A list of reports on commencement of internal investigation, reports, and handling of reported cases;

1. CCTV image CDs, such as photographs after a CCTV closure;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes governing family relations certificates;

1. Article 71(1)2 of the relevant Act and subparagraph 6 of Article 17 of the former Child Reinstatement Act (Amended by Act No. 14925, Oct. 24, 2017);

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 8 of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Punishment, etc. of Child Abuse Offenses by Ordering Education [the scope of recommendations] Arrest, confinement, abandonment, or abuse of and abandonment of and abuse to two categories (serious abandonment or abuse): Special mitigation element: in a case where the degree of abandonment is serious [the decision of sentence] (the crime of this case is limited to nine months after the defendant was born in PC and under his protection and supervision, and the crime of this case results in the death of the victim.

However, the defendant recognized the crime of this case and divided his mistake, and the defendant maliciously deserted her father.

The defendant does not seem to be able to lead a happy family without preventing such a mistake.

The defendant's wife who is suffering from the victim's maternal interest and the defendant's wife wanted to take the defendant's wife, and due to this case, the defendant himself suffered a big mental suffering than other persons.