However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On March 13, 2013, at around 23:38, the Defendant was demanded to respond to a drinking test by inserting the drinking measuring instrument three minutes in a drinking measuring instrument, in order to put the drinking measuring instrument into the front side of the Suwon-nam Police Station, which was dispatched after receiving a 112 report from C to C of the Suwon-nam Police Station, that there is a driver who is standing to stop another vehicle and stop on the driver's seat while driving the vehicle from around 200 meters away from around 987-5 to the road before the same 987-5.

Nevertheless, the defendant refused to take a drinking-free measuring instrument, and did not comply with a police officer's request for a drinking-free measuring instrument without justifiable grounds.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs of suspect vehicles and photographs refusing to measure drinking;

1. Relevant Article of the Act on the Crime and Articles 148-2 (1) 2 and 44 (2) of the Road Traffic Act that selects the penalty;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62-2 (1) of the Criminal Act to attend lectures;