beta
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2014.08.22 2014고합191

가스유출

Text

1. The defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months;

2. Provided, That the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive;

3.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On May 8, 2014, from around 22:40 to 22:54, the Defendant, at the Defendant’s home located in broad name B, carried out gas leakage by cutting off ices connected to gas bags, which were located in the home, on the ground that the Defendant paid a large amount of money by using credit cards at singing rooms, etc.

Accordingly, the Defendant leaked gas and caused danger to human life, body or property.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

2. The police statement concerning C;

3. Application of each statute of photograph;

1. Article 172-2 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the relevant criminal facts;

2. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

3. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

4. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act of probation and community service order;

1. The scope of applicable sentences: Imprisonment for six months to five years;

2. In this case, the sentence of sentence is determined: (a) the Defendant, while engaging in a dispute with his wife at his own house, has come well to leak gas by easily exposing the ice connected to his gas bags; (b) the occurrence of huge property and human life damage caused by gas explosion seems to have occurred; (c) in this respect, the nature of the crime and the circumstances are not good; and (d) thus, the Defendant’s liability cannot be deemed to be light.

However, the Defendant appears to have committed the instant crime in a contingent manner, which did not take the instant case in a state of drinking, and was committed by himself at the time of committing the instant crime. The Defendant voluntarily reported to the police at the time of committing the instant crime, the confession of the instant crime, the wife’s failure to punish the Defendant, and the wife has no record of being punished for the same crime or of being punished heavier than the fine for other crimes.

The above points and the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, family relationship, motive of crime, etc.