The Defendants did not pay each of the above fines.

The Defendants and C conspired to use the vehicle repair cost, agreement money, etc. from an insurance company, by pretending that the vehicle accident was caused intentionally due to the post-ship and the friendly relationship and that the accident was caused by negligence.

On January 17, 2014, around 10:30 on the road near D in the Gyeonggi City, Defendants and C shall operate the ED vehicle, and Defendant A shall drive the FOs vehicle with the intent to collision with the said COs vehicle while driving the vehicle while Defendant B was accompanied by the FOs vehicle, and immediately report as if Defendant A had a traffic accident, and received KRW 22,932,830,00 in total from the victim as the vehicle repair cost and the agreement amount, etc., as the vehicle accident occurred in the vehicle operation insurance for the victim LIG damage insurance that Defendant A purchased.

As a result, Defendants and C were provided property by deceiving the victim in collusion.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. A motor vehicle compensation receipt;

1. A written inquiry about automobile insurance contract, and a written resolution for payment of automobile agreement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on the termination of water accidents and damage adjusting;

1. Articles 347(1) and 30 of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting a crime;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for the reason of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act or more.