A. Although the Defendant did not know the victims' chests or let them sold, the lower court found the victims guilty of this part of the facts charged and found the facts guilty.

B. The sentence of the lower court’s improper sentencing (4 months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. The defendant's assertion on this part is rejected, since the court below duly adopted and examined the facts, especially according to the victim E's legal statement of the court below and the victim G police statement, it can sufficiently recognize that the defendant forced the victims to commit an indecent act.

B. The degree of indecent act against the victim E is insignificant. However, in light of the following circumstances: (a) the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence for the same kind of crime and repeatedly committed each of the instant crimes during the grace period; (b) the Defendant denied the crime up to the trial; and (c) the Defendant’s age, sexual conduct, intelligence and environment; (d) the background leading to the instant crime; (b) the method and method of the instant crime; and (c) the circumstances after the commission of the crime, etc., the sentence of the lower court is too unreasonable.

Therefore, we cannot accept this part of the defendant's assertion.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal of this case is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.