When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On August 21, 2013, at around 21:33, the Defendant driven a Danb Co., Ltd. under the influence of alcohol concentration of about 0.154% at the section of about 3 km from the roads in front of the funeral home located in the Asan City Hot Spring Complex to the roads in front of the same Matern rice conference located in the same Materndong.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to reports on detection of drivers and reports on the statement of the status of drivers;

1. Relevant laws concerning criminal facts, and Articles 148-2 (2) 2 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act, and selection of fines;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act on April 25, 2013 of the order of provisional payment is that the defendant was sentenced to imprisonment for two years and three years of suspension of execution due to a violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (a deadly weapons, injury, etc.) on the part of this court, and even during the current suspension of execution, there seems to be no room for preference in that he committed the crime of drinking driving in this case on the remaining four months from the above suspension date. However, it is difficult to view that the defendant was led to the confession of the crime, and the facts charged in this case itself are merely a simple drinking driving, and the defendant shall be selected and punished by a fine among