강등처분취소
1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.
1. The grounds for appeal by the plaintiff citing the judgment of the court of first instance are not significantly different from the allegations in the court of first instance, and the fact-finding and judgment of the court of first instance are deemed
Therefore, the reasoning of the judgment of the court on this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the addition of the following matters, and thus, this Court shall accept it as it is in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 420 of the
[Supplementary Contents] On the 8th sentence of the first instance judgment, the following is added after the third sentence.
In addition, D and F make a statement to the effect that “the Plaintiff created KRW 10 million,00,000,000,000,000,000, in one month in order to compensate for the damage that the Plaintiff intended to make D and to make the hospital (No. 13, No. 7, No. 4, and No. 5).” The Plaintiff’s assertion about the purport and purpose of opening the passbook is difficult to believe, and there is no other evidence to deem that the above passbook was actually managed or intended to use the passbook. The Plaintiff’s assertion on this part is rejected.”
2. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case is dismissed as it is without merit, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.