A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for six months and by imprisonment for eight months.

[Basic Facts] The seller E and the buyer F entered into a sales contract (hereinafter “the instant sales contract”) with G Daecheon-si (hereinafter “the instant land”) on January 13, 2014, and Defendant A arranged the instant sales contract at the office of a certified judicial scrivener around January 13, 2014, on the ground that the seller was the buyer’s land, Defendant B was in company with E and F, etc. on the ground that the seller was the buyer’s land.

Meanwhile, as a result of surveying the instant land after the instant sales contract, F was found to have included a road and a dry field possessed by another person in the area of 972 square meters, and its size was about 330 square meters (100 square meters) from the total area of the instant land. Since at the time of the formation of the instant sales contract, F was not informed of the fact that the instant land was included in the road, etc. at all at the time of the formation of the sales contract, the instant sales contract was entered into an erroneous representation of the current status of the relevant important part of the land, and the instant sales contract was revoked. On March 10, 2014, F was the Plaintiff, and B was the Defendant, and C was the Plaintiff, and C was the Defendant, seeking the return of the purchase price (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2014Da1009, Mar. 10, 2014; hereinafter referred to as “instant civil lawsuit”). The Defendants filed a lawsuit with a certified judicial scrivener at the time of preparation of the instant contract.

1. Defendant A