except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On July 10, 2014, around 22:50, the Defendant: (a) followed the “C” convenience store located in Ansan-si B, Ansan-si; (b) went through a dispute with the victim D (50 years of age) who is a workplace partner; (c) went through a dispute with the victim; and (d) 2 times the head of the victim; and (d) assaulted the victim by carrying dangerous things.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. Application of statutes on photographs of damage;

1. Articles 3 (1) and 2 (1) 1 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act concerning the crime concerned, Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 53 or 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation (see, e.g., that the injured party does not want punishment of the accused by the unanimous agreement; that the health and economic situation of the accused are not good; that of the accused; that of the accused’s reflectivity);

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the stay of execution (Considering repeated circumstances considered in discretionary mitigation, and considering the fact that the defendant has no criminal record);