업무방해등
1. The defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months and a fine of thirty million won; and
2. The defendant does not pay the above fine.
Punishment of the crime
1. Obstruction of business;
A. On June 1, 2016, at around 20:00, the Defendant: (a) operated by the Victim D in Mapo-gu Seoul Mapo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government on June 1, 2016, e.g., “E” through “E” and “E” through the front day of the city in front of the kitchen; (b) by putting a smaller’s disease under the care of the manager on the house and cutting it up on the floor; and (c) “A person who
In other words, it interfered with the victim's restaurant business by force by preventing customers from entering the said store by avoiding the disturbance for about one hour, such as passing sound.
B. At the time and place specified in the preceding paragraph, the Defendant sent a picture to the victim F, on the ground that the victim F was not able to report to him/her at his/her own time and place, and why is why is why he/she would rest.
“Around one-hour period of time, the radio on which the finger lele was knife by hand was frightened, thereby obstructing the victim’s street store business operation by force.
2. The Defendant in violation of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act on June 1, 2016, on the ground that he was under the influence of alcohol within the police box located in Mapo-gu Seoul, Mapo-gu, Seoul, Police Station Horsa in Mapo-gu, and that he arrested himself under the same suspicion as Paragraph 1, on the ground that he arrested him.
Rings, kings, and kings, Lings, Lings, and Lings.
Chewing sark, etc., made verbal abuse to police officers I, slope J, etc. working in the line of duty on the ground of “sark”, etc.
From around 22:40 on the same day, the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol for about 30 minutes, had a riotous and disorderly speech and behavior in a public office.
Summary of Evidence
[Judgment No. 1]
1. Statement by the defendant in court;
1. Each police statement made to D or F [the facts set forth in the judgment of the court below];
1. Statement by the defendant in court;
1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to film and video data in order to revoke the owner of a government office;
1. Relevant Article 314 of the Criminal Act and Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the crime, the choice of punishment, and minor crimes.