A. The Plaintiff and the Defendant are co-owners of real estate indicated in the text (hereinafter “instant land”), and the Plaintiff owns 2/3 shares, and the Defendant owns 1/3 shares.

The plaintiff is seeking to resolve the co-ownership relationship, and there was no agreement on the method of division between the plaintiff and the defendant.

B. The instant land is difficult or inappropriate to divide in kind due to the existence of unregistered buildings on the ground.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, entry of Gap 1 and 2 evidence, purport of the whole pleadings

2. According to the above facts of determination, the Plaintiff, as co-owners, may claim a court to divide the land of this case, which is co-owned property, and the method of subdivision is to sell the land of this case by auction and distribute the price in proportion to co-ownership shares.

3. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds above the conclusion.