A Imprisonment with prison labor for eight months and fines for 5,000,000 won, and Defendant B shall be punished by fines for 2,000,000 won, respectively.

The Defendants are the defendants.

Defendant

A from May 11, 2016, rents three floors in the Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Gwanak-gu D Building, and after employing women E, F, G, H, etc., and then publicizing the Internet sexual traffic advertising site "I" in the name of "J", etc. and publicizing it to the Internet sexual traffic advertising site, etc., and Defendant B is the head of office employed by Defendant A.

On June 22, 2016, the Defendants received 65,000 won from K male customers who reported advertisement in the above I at around 21:20 on June 22, 2016, and caused F to do the similar act, such as deceiving K's sexual organ as soon as possible or harming K's sexual organ.

Accordingly, Defendants conspired to arrange sexual traffic for business from May 11, 2016 to June 22, 2016.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each police interrogation protocol against E, F, G, H, L, and K;

1. The police statement of M;

1. Records of seizure and the list of seizure;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on control field photographs;

1. Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic, Etc., Article 30 of the Criminal Act concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Defendant A who choose a sentence: Imprisonment with prison labor and the concurrent imposition of fines (Article 24 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic): Defendant B: Selection of fines;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention in a workhouse (the defendants);

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Defendant A);

1. Probation (Defendant A) Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;

1. (Defendant A) Article 48(1)1 of the Criminal Act, Article 25 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic, Etc.

1. In full view of the following specific circumstances in the sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act (the Defendant) and the methods and patterns of the instant crime, each of the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, family environment, and circumstances before and after the commission of the crime, the sentence like the order was determined.

1. All recognition of Defendant A’s crime and its depth reflects it.