However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. On August 2016, the Defendant interfered with the victim’s restaurant business by force for about 20 minutes, such as the Defendant’s offage and sound drinking while drinking, and the Defendant’s 60 minutes of drinking at the D cafeteria operated by the victim C (n, 60 years of age) (n, fl, and 8 years of age).

2. On August 2016, the Defendant interfered with the victim’s convenience store business by force for about 20 minutes, such as: (a) the victim F (n, 48 years of age) in the wife E (n, the 48 years of age) at the G convenience store operated by the Defendant, and (b) the Defendant, in the state of drinking, took a bath to the customers who enter the said place without any justifiable reason; and (c) the Defendant, in receipt of a demand from the injured party, and the visitors who enter the entrance and exit room, who wish to make a request from the injured party.

3. On February 2, 2017, the Defendant interfered with the victim’s coffee business by force for about 10 minutes, such as: (a) entering the victim I (n, 40 years of age) (n, 8 years of age) in the Defendant’s wife H; (b) entering the J coffee shop in the state of alcohol; and (c) taking the victim’s desire to take a phone to the victim; and (d) taking the victim’s call to the victim, thereby obstructing the victim’s coffee shop business by force.

4. On February 2, 2017, the Defendant obstructed the victim’s restaurant business by force for about 20 minutes due to a disturbance, such as: (a) entering and drinking a victim L (44 years) in K with the wife population at G; and (b) repeatedly repeatedly repeatedly talking in the form of a mixed-level large volume.

5. On March 17, 2017, the Defendant obstructed the victim’s restaurant business by force for about 10 minutes of the disturbance, and interfered with the victim’s restaurant business by force, for about 10 minutes of the disturbance, at the P cafeteria operated by the victim’sO (n, 32 years of age) located in the wife population N (n, the 32 years of age).

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each statement of C, F, I, L, andO;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a criminal investigation intelligence report;

1. The corresponding criminal provisions of the Criminal Act concerning the facts of crime; and