beta
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2019.11.20 2018가합574221

하자보수보증금 청구의 소

Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 322,373,413 among the Plaintiff and KRW 201,00,000 among the Plaintiff, shall be KRW 121,373,413.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. Status 1 of the parties concerned) The Plaintiff is Ansan-gu Ma apartment (hereinafter “instant apartment”).

(2) In order to manage the 15-dong 15-dong 1,134 households, D Apartment Reconstruction Project Association (hereinafter “instant association”) is a executor of the instant apartment, and the Intervenor joining the Defendant is a corporation that has guaranteed the repair of defects in the instant apartment.

B. A pre-use inspection and the occupancy apartment of this case had undergone the pre-use inspection on September 30, 2009, and around that time, they were delivered to the occupants.

C. The No.1 E of the warranty period under the Housing Act: (a) concluded the warranty period from September 28, 2009 to September 27, 2019; (b) F 2: 915,111,770 on September 28, 2009 to September 27, 2014 (5 years) 915,11,770 on September 27, 201; and (c) the Defendant’s Intervenor entered each of the instant warranty creditors into the warranty warranty contract with the 1,830,23,5394 H 209 to the 1,200,539, and the Defendant’s Intervenor entered each of the instant warranty creditors into the warranty warranty contract with the 205,50,000 (3), 205, 296, 296, 296, 296, 209).

The Defendant 1 did not construct the part to be constructed in accordance with the design drawing, or constructed the part to be constructed in accordance with the design drawing, unlike the drawing, or constructed the said part in bad faith, and there was a defect such as rupture and water leakage in the section for common use of the apartment of this case. The Plaintiff from May 2010.