2. We examine the judgment, and the fact that the defendant is against himself while making a confession of the crime of this case, and the crime of this case is in the concurrent relationship between the violation of the Attorney-at-Law Act of the first head of the crime of this case as stated in the judgment of the court below and the latter part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and if the judgment was rendered at the same time, the

However, the crime of this case is committed by deceiving the victim by deceiving the victim and deceiving the victim 50 million won in the name of the victim's parent university admission expenses, etc., and the crime is not less than the simple crime, and the amount of fraud is also the amount which is not much, and the defendant commits the crime of this case which is the same kind during the repeated crime period after being punished due to fraud, etc., the defendant did not reach an agreement with the victim, and other circumstances that are conditions for sentencing under Article 51 of the Criminal Act as stated in the records and arguments, such as the motive for the crime of this case, character and behavior, environment, family relationship, etc. of the defendant, the punishment imposed by the court below is too unreasonable. Thus, the above argument of the defendant is without merit.

3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.