2. Defendant B Co., Ltd.:

(a) 12,600.

(a) Indication of claims: To be as shown in the reasons for the claims;

(limited to the part against the above Defendants). B

Judgment by deemed confession: Article 208(3)2 of the Civil Procedure Act

2. Determination as to the claim against Defendant C

A. Defendant C asserts that there was no fact that the Plaintiff sent to Defendant C a certificate of content that the Plaintiff notified the termination of the contract in writing.

However, with the consent of the defendant Eul Co., Ltd. and the above defendant C residing in the real estate stated in the separate sheet with the consent of the tenant, expressed his intention not to pay the rent to the plaintiff any longer before the lawsuit of this case is filed. The plaintiff verbally notified that the plaintiff will deliver the real estate. The copy of the complaint of this case seeking to specify the real estate against the defendants due to the termination of the lease contract and the fact that the certified copy of the statement of pleading as of July 14, 2015 was delivered to the defendants is evident in the record or recognized by the purport of the whole pleadings

Accordingly, the lease contract between the plaintiff and the defendant Eul on the attached real estate was terminated, and the termination was notified to the defendant C.

B. Defendant C asserts that since the amount of lease deposit exceeds the unpaid rent remains, it does not inflict any damage on the Plaintiff.

However, just because the lease deposit remains, the plaintiff's claim seeking the termination of the lease contract and the transfer of real estate can not be asserted.

3. The plaintiff's claim for the conclusion is justified, and all of them are accepted.