A. On November 10, 2018, G is under the influence of alcohol at around 23:10 on November 10, 2018 (hereinafter “Defendant vehicle”). G is under the influence of alcohol with a blood alcohol concentration of 0.070%.

ii)a network K (hereinafter referred to as “the network”) coming from the intersection from the side of the I Hospital to the J School while driving along the intersection of the intersection of the intersection of the intersection of the intersection of the intersection of the intersection of the intersection of the intersection of the intersection of the intersection of the intersection of the intersection of the intersection of the intersection of the intersection of the intersection of the intersection of the intersection of the speed exceeding 32 km per hour, without stopping, even though the intersection of the intersection of the intersection of the speed of the intersection of the speed of the intersection of the intersection of the intersection

) The part on the front door of the Defendant’s seat driven by the taxi was moved into front part of the Defendant’s vehicle and the said taxi was returned to the said taxi (hereinafter “instant accident”).

2) As a result of the instant accident, the Deceased died on the day of the instant accident to the end of the two outer frame.

3) The Plaintiff A, B, and E are the parents of the Deceased, the Plaintiff C, D, and the Defendant are the siblings of the Deceased, and the Defendant is the insurer who entered into an automobile comprehensive insurance contract on the Defendant’s vehicle. According to the fact of recognition of liability, the Defendant, as the insurer of the Defendant vehicle, barring special circumstances, is liable for the damages incurred by the Deceased and the Plaintiffs due to the instant accident. (c) In light of the body and degree of the Deceased’s injury, the Defendant appears to have failed to wear the safety bell, and thus, the Defendant’s negligence should be taken into account in the traffic accident report. However, in light of the degree of shock and shock of the vehicle, the instant accident was investigated as wearing the safety bell, and it is determined that the instant accident is an accident that may cause the death accident regardless of the wearing of the safety bell. The Defendant’s assertion is not accepted. The Defendant’s allegation is without merit.