2. The judgment of the court below seems to have recognized all of the crimes of this case, the total amount of damage of the victims is only 934,00 won, the victim D and F paid food and taxi expenses in favor of the court below, or there are many criminal records of the defendant. In particular, from October 23, 2012 to October 10, 2013, the defendant was sentenced four times or more as the crime of this case, such as the crime of this case, without being informed of the fact that the defendant was sentenced four times or more as the crime of this case, and the defendant repeated the crime of this case; the defendant was unable to be considered as a living-type crime due to his life, unlike the crime of non-exclusive or non-exclusive riding; the normal circumstances of the defendant have already been considered in the appellate court; and there are no changes in circumstances and circumstances that are likely to reflect the defendant's new punishment in the sentencing; and there is no reason to view the defendant's punishment as a whole after the crime of this case.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.