If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

On June 18, 2013, around 08:30 on 08:30 on 18, 2013, on the ground that the victim D (the age of 61, the age of 61) was parked immediately before the third 304, the Defendant got the front part of the victim, and suffered injury, such as the string on the right side of the victim, which requires treatment for about 28 days.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of witness D;

1. A written diagnosis of injury;

1. Application of CCTV-recording statutes;

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of penalties;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for not less than Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.

Defendant

The judgment of the defendant and his defense counsel's assertion are consistently stated to the effect that the front part of the victim's actual loss was faced by the defendant's math while the defendant and his defense counsel have a verbal dispute. The defendant argued that the front part of the victim's injury was not caused by the victim's injury as stated in the facts charged. However, this court has duly adopted and investigated the following facts and circumstances, i.e., the victim D's parking problem from the investigation agency to this court, and that the defendant's "the defendant cannot get back for the time from the invasion", and that he was faced with his desire by this part. On the day of this case, the victim was consistently stated to the effect that he was faced with the victim's entrance. The victim suffered from CCTV's injury by the victim's 28 days because of the fact that the victim's previous part was needed to receive medical treatment due to the fact that the victim was in need of the injury for about 28 days due to the fact that the victim and the other party stated in the CCTV will at the time of this case.